Posts tagged india and pakistan

Kashmir’s cricket bat makers suffer amid violence

In Indian-ruled Kashmir, few businesses have been spared in three months of violence and curfews, with the region’s famed cricket bat manufacturers especially hard hit.

Until recently, droves of Indian tourists would stop by shops in Halmulla, one of 10 villages and hamlets where skilled craftsmen carve out bats of all sizes from locally grown willow.

Almost every family in the riverside district has a stake in the local industry, which began during British colonial rule on the subcontinent after willow was introduced to the Himalayan region.

Today, factory owners say daily anti-India protests that erupted on June 11 and have claimed 69 lives have been catastrophic for their businesses.

“We are still exporting bats to cities like Mumbai and New Delhi but the overall business has taken a nosedive due to the unrest,” said Mohammed Amin, who owns Good Luck Sports.

“Before the trouble, Indian traders used to visit us and order in bulk, but now no one comes,” said Amin, as he supervised his workers loading a consignment into a waiting truck.

“Some orders are made through telephone, but even if there are orders, we are finding it difficult to transport the goods outside as a majority of Indian truckers are avoiding Kashmir,” he said.

Inside his factory, a few workers add the finishing touches to the latest products, but huge piles of unfinished bat-sized blocks point to the collapse in sales.

“This village used to be abuzz with activities, but see what it looks like now,” said Amin, pointing to streets devoid of residents but full of Indian troops in full battle gear.

Kashmir’s divided and violent modern history, like its cricket bat industry, has its roots in colonial rule on the subcontinent.

The Muslim-majority region has been fought over by India and Pakistan since the partition of British-ruled India in 1947, with the region now cut in two along a UN-monitored line of control.

Many on the Indian side reject rule from New Delhi and a violent insurgency that has claimed an estimated 47,000 lives has raged for much of the past 20 years.

The optimism generated from a lull in fighting last year has quickly dissipated in the face of the violent street protests led by unhappy and frustrated young Kashmiris.

Each death has spurred a new cycle of violence, curfews and strikes which have crippled businesses in the tourism-dependent region.

“Before the protests started we used to manufacture about 200 bats daily but the output has now fallen to 50 pieces,” said 60-year-old Abdul Ahad Dar, owner of New Sports Works, as he pointed to a huge stock of bats in his warehouse.

Even during the peak of the insurgency, the workers in Halmulla, 37 kilometres (23 miles) south of Kashmir’s biggest town Srinagar, would work quietly at their craft using wood dried for seven months in local warehouses.

“Our villages were never affected by strikes and protests but this time the agitation is severe and our own sons and grandsons don’t allow us to open the shops and factories,” added Dar.

The industry employs around 10,000 people and collectively manufactures nearly a million bats a year at prices ranging from 100 to 1,000 rupees (two to 20 dollars).

Most are sold to visiting Indian tourists, with the rest going directly to shops in the main cities of the cricket-obsessed country.

Willow arrived in Kashmir courtesy of the British, who imported the fast-growing tree to use as firewood and a material for bat manufacturing during colonial times.

The products today are widely used across the subcontinent by children and amateur players, though English willow remains the wood of choice for international big-hitters.

Public opinion in Kashmir is divided between a hardline faction who seek a merger of Indian Kashmir with Pakistan, others who want independence and a moderate group who seek meaningful autonomy.

A string of decades-old UN Security Council resolutions call for a referendum to allow the Kashmiri people to choose between India and Pakistan, but have never been implemented.

Despite the current hardship, factory owner Dar believes the protests will be worth it if they help resolve the deadlock over the status of the region.

One daily Indian newspaper reported Monday that the Indian government was considering partly repealing draconian laws that give security forces impunity in Kashmir, which would be a victory of sorts.

“If this agitation brings us permanent peace and resolution, it is worth it,” Dar said. “It is better to agitate than to live in a stalemate.”

Sunil Sharan: Enemy in Need can be Friend Indeed

Come hell or high water, India and Pakistan’s leaders continually nose-thumb one another. Each snub is met with a counter-snub; every kindness by suspicion and prickliness. Memories of ghosts past inspire cold shoulders today. Would the enemy crow about its magnanimity for all time to come? Might acceptance of help be construed by the other as weakness to be parlayed into future gain? Or, worst perhaps of all, would public opinion shift and make redundant much of the carefully-constructed paraphernalia of conflict?

Pakistan started getting inundated in late July. Only two weeks later, on August 13, with much of the country deluged, did India extend an offer of $5 million in aid. Predictably, Pakistan stonewalled. Both countries had swallowed pride before to accept assistance in kind after massive earthquakes, but taking pity money now was stooping just too low. And, funnily enough, the man who wrote the check, India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, did not once bother to commiserate with his neighbour in his Independence Day address two days later. Instead, like a stuck record, he once again cautioned Pakistan against fomenting terrorism in his country. For a man being hailed globally as a model of grace and humility, this was no shining moment.

Hackles raised, Pakistan dug in. Already paralyzed by bomb blasts, ground war, air strikes, a plane crash, and with a huge chunk of the country now deluged, was the country in any position to terrorize anyone? Moreover, its image in the West as the house of terror, a portrait etched to perfection by India, was already coming in the way of flood relief. A new imbroglio was thus created. Only a phone call from Manmohan Singh to Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani of Pakistan and a nudge, oops, more like a shove, from the Americans were able to resolve it. Gilani acquiesced in the subcontinental fashion, wherein ‘yes’ is often mouthed when ‘no’ is actually meant, and seemingly sealed the deal by sending choice mangoes to Singh.

Read More…
More on Extreme Weather


Is New Delhi working on Kashmir solution?

At least 64 people have been killed across Kashmir during anti-India demonstrations, one of the worst outbreaks of unrest since a separatist revolt against New Delhi broke out in 1989.

A Kashmiri protester throws a stone towards police during an anti-India protest in Srinagar August 30, 2010. REUTERS/Danish IsmailFrequent curfews, security lockdown and separatist strikes have kept the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley on the boil, shutting down much of the region for the past two and a half months.

New Delhi has been criticised for failing to respond to violence that has wounded hundreds, closed down schools and colleges also.

But now Kashmir’s chief minister, Omar Abdullah, has hinted at a political solution of the crisis by New Delhi in the coming days.

“The Union government is actively working for a political solution,” Abdullah said and expressed hope that an “amicable and peaceful” settlement would not be too far off.

After several failed rounds of peace talks between separatists and the Centre in the past two decades, India will find it difficult bridging the “trust deficit” between New  Delhi and Kashmir, a region seen as key to the stability of a broad zone ranging from India to Afghanistan.

Abdullah expressed hope that New Delhi will take positive steps in addressing the political issues of Kashmir in a sustained dialogue process avoiding the “re-occurrence of mistakes done in the past.”

“Kashmir issue has political genesis and it has originated with the independence of India and the birth of Pakistan. The over 60-year-old problem has become a complex one and requires sustained political efforts by all the stakeholders  through a dialogue process to resolve it as per the aspirations of the people of the state,” Abdullah added.

Sentiment against New Delhi’s rule runs deep in the disputed Kashmir region, which is claimed both by India and Pakistan.

Kashmiri separatists want to carve out an independent homeland or merge with predominantly Muslim Pakistan.

But New Delhi sees Kashmir as an integral part of India, key to highlighting the secular nature of the Hindu-majority nation.

Is New Delhi ready for a political solution to end the decades-old dispute over Kashmir that may encourage further demands for independence from other states, especially in its northeast region near China?

Steve Clemons: US Strategic Opportunity in Pakistan Flooding Relief

e_picture-2_lahore-pakistan-flooding_ed.jpgGeorge Soros is working hard behind the scenes to help the Obama administration realize that a billion dollars spent now, carefully, and in a structure that could create a systemic improvement in Indus River water management helping India and Pakistan would be greatly welcomed by the currently besieged victims in Pakistan of historic-level flooding and help preempt a greater tilt towards instability in South Asia than already exists.

I won’t go into the detail of the Soros plan as it would be best if it became the Richard Holbrooke plan, or the Hillary Clinton plan, the Kerry-Lugar plan, or the Singh-Zardari plan, but I am satisfied that in contrast to so many schemes I hear in which people advocate a billion being thrown here or there — the critical need ‘now’ combined with a unique opportunity for the United States to constructively improve the lot over the near and long term of people who don’t think well of America makes great sense.

Now that we are spending monthly figures in Afghanistan that surpass $100 billion per year, it seems to me that a well-managed $1 billion investment in Pakistan would do much to improve the political environment in Afghanistan and Pakistan — large portions of the peoples of which respectively mistrust the U.S.

Read More…
More on Barack Obama


India, Pakistan can’t break the ice, even in hour of tragedy

PAKISTAN-FLOODS/

 

Pakistan’s catastrophic flood continues to boggle the mind, both in terms of the human tragedy and the scale of the damage it has wrought, and even more so over the longer term.  One official has likened the disaster to the cyclone that devastated what was once East Pakistan, setting off a chain of events that eventually led to its secession and the birth of Bangladesh.

Not even that spectre, raised by Pakistan’s ambassador to Britain, can however dent the steadfast hostility between India and Pakistan.   For a full three weeks as the floods  worked their way  through the spine of Pakistan from the turbulent northwest to Sindh in the south, Islamabad made frantic appeals to the international community not ignore the slow-moving disaster,  and help it with emergency aid, funds. But next-door India, best-placed to mount  a relief effort probably more because of the geography than any special skill at emergency relief, was kept at arm’s length. An Indian aid offer of $5 million, which itself came after some hesitation and is at best modest,was lying on the table for days before Pakistan accepted it.   ”There are a lot of sensitivities between India and Pakistan … but we are considering it very seriously,” a Pakistani embassy spokesman told our reporter in New Delhi earlier this week.  Things appeared to have moved faster only after Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh called his Pakistani counterpart Yusuf Raza Gilani expressing sympathy and reminding him of the offer of aid. Millions of Pakistans meanwhile continued to struggle for food.

To some extent, Pakistan’s hesitation in accepting aid from India is understandable. India is the traditional enemy. It is also the bigger country of the two. And over the last two decades it has become easily the more prosperous entity, courted by the world’s industrialists while Pakistan is “haunted by the world’s terrorists”, as columnist Vir Sanghvi writes in the Hindustan Times.   A Pew poll that we wrote about a few weeks ago showed how deep-seated these Pakistani fears are:  a majority of those polled said they considered India to be the bigger threat than al Qaeda or the Taliban, despite the violence they have suffered at the hands of the militant groups over the past few years.

As Sanghvi writes:

But, to be fair to the Pakistanis, let us accept the position that decades of hostility between our two countries have led to a situation where the Pakistanis simply do not trust us. Let us also accept that they are so resentful of India that even in their hour of greatest crisis when thousands of people have died and millions are homeless, they will still spurn India’s hand of friendship. And let us grant them their claim that given our history, they are justified in being suspicious of India.

  But then, you have to wonder, if the two nations cannot even keep up basic neighbourly ties such as offering aid and commiseration at times of natural crises, what chances they can ever come to a peace deal that will demand much more from them ?

It was pretty much the same in 2005 when the earthquake struck Pakistani Kashmir and the authorities struggled to provide aid to the affected.  And Indian aid offer was  initially ignored,  later blankets from India were accepted. But even then Pakistan had people cut out the label that read ‘made in India’ on each blanket.  

Indeed, some Pakistani writers are already criticising the government of bringing dishonour to the country by accepting Indian assistance. Commentator  Shireen M. Mazari  in a piece entitled “What Have We Become” says the Pakistani government accepted the Indian offer for help under pressure from the United States and that it was a matter of shame.  By taking Indian aid, Pakistan had let the people of  Kashmiri down just when they had risen in revolt against Indian forces.

“This money has the blood of Kashmiris on it and one wonders how our Kashmiri brethren must be feeling as they face the bullets of Indian forces every day and see us taking Indian “aid”,” Mazari wrote.

Kashmir, then,  can’t be far from any discourse relating to India and Pakistan. It is the core dispute  at the heart of 60 years of difficult ties, says Pakistan and must be resolved before any normalcy can take place. India doesn’t even consider the territory to be disputed, so the argument, at least in public, hasn’t changed much in over half a century. 

For the 20 million affected by the flooding in Pakistan, and facing a  future that would daunt any of us, Kashmir must, at the moment, be a distant thought.  

 

Unrest In Kashmir — News Updates August 11, 2010


Separatist Anger Rages Under Curfew In Kashmir — New York Times/Reuters

SRINAGAR, India (Reuters) – In the world’s largest democracy, it is curfew time.

Many of Indian Kashmir’s streets lie deserted aside from stray dogs. Police, who have killed dozens of protesters defying India’s efforts to quell a separatist uprising, stand at street corners in the region’s summer capital of Srinagar.

“He only went out to get biscuits,” said Maroofa Khan, telling how police shot dead her cousin, 17-year-old Mohammed Iqbal. A shop owner found Iqbal lying on the ground: a bullet pierced the back of his head, forcing an eyeball out of its socket. He died six days later.

Read more ….

More News On the Unrest In Kashmir

PM’s plan for J&K autonomy has few takers — Times Of India
PM’s initiative on Kashmir ‘wasted exercise’: JD(U) — Times of India
Kashmir separatists reject PM’s autonomy offer — AFP
Kashmir needs political solution: PM — Business Standard
Restraint by security forces in Kashmir demanded — Sify
Woman killed, 17 hurt in J&K terror attack — Economic Times
Four killed in pre-Ramadan violence in Indian Kashmir — AFP
3 policemen, 1 civilian killed in fighting in Indian Kashmir, say police — Canadian Press
4 killed, 18 hurt in fighting in Indian Kashmir as protesters defy curfews — Today Online
Kashmir youths chucking careers to pelt stones — Times Of India
UN makes plea to India over helmets – The Independent/AP
UN asks Indian paramilitary soldiers in Kashmir to stop using UN peacekeeping helmets — Canadian Press
The other Kashmir problem: India and Pakistan tussle over water — Christian Science Monitor
India’s blinkered policy on Kashmir — Simon Tisdall, The Guardian

Unrest In Kashmir — News Updates August 11, 2010 is a post from: Updated News

Unrest In Kashmir — News Updates August 11, 2010


Separatist Anger Rages Under Curfew In Kashmir — New York Times/Reuters

SRINAGAR, India (Reuters) – In the world’s largest democracy, it is curfew time.

Many of Indian Kashmir’s streets lie deserted aside from stray dogs. Police, who have killed dozens of protesters defying India’s efforts to quell a separatist uprising, stand at street corners in the region’s summer capital of Srinagar.

“He only went out to get biscuits,” said Maroofa Khan, telling how police shot dead her cousin, 17-year-old Mohammed Iqbal. A shop owner found Iqbal lying on the ground: a bullet pierced the back of his head, forcing an eyeball out of its socket. He died six days later.

Read more ….

More News On the Unrest In Kashmir

PM’s plan for J&K autonomy has few takers — Times Of India
PM’s initiative on Kashmir ‘wasted exercise’: JD(U) — Times of India
Kashmir separatists reject PM’s autonomy offer — AFP
Kashmir needs political solution: PM — Business Standard
Restraint by security forces in Kashmir demanded — Sify
Woman killed, 17 hurt in J&K terror attack — Economic Times
Four killed in pre-Ramadan violence in Indian Kashmir — AFP
3 policemen, 1 civilian killed in fighting in Indian Kashmir, say police — Canadian Press
4 killed, 18 hurt in fighting in Indian Kashmir as protesters defy curfews — Today Online
Kashmir youths chucking careers to pelt stones — Times Of India
UN makes plea to India over helmets – The Independent/AP
UN asks Indian paramilitary soldiers in Kashmir to stop using UN peacekeeping helmets — Canadian Press
The other Kashmir problem: India and Pakistan tussle over water — Christian Science Monitor
India’s blinkered policy on Kashmir — Simon Tisdall, The Guardian

U.N. plays down “guidance” on Kashmir

U.N. chief Ban Ki-moons spokesman says Ban never said a word about Kashmir.

U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon's spokesman says Ban never said a word about Kashmir

The United Nations is playing down a statement on Kashmir a U.N. spokesman sent to a small group of reporters last week. After India made clear that it was very unhappy with the language on Kashmir issued by the U.N. press office, the world body explained that U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon had never uttered the offending words.

This is the full text of what U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky has described as “media guidance” on Kashmir, as provided to Reuters by one of the reporters who received it by email on July 28:

“In relation to recent developments in Indian-administered Kashmir, the Secretary-General is concerned over the prevailing security situation there over the past month. He calls on all concerned to exercise utmost restraint and address problems peacefully.

“The Secretary-General welcomes the recent resumption of Foreign Minister-level talks between India and Pakistan. He encourages both sides to rekindle the spirit of the composite dialogue, which was initiated in 2004 and had made encouraging progress on some important confidence building measures, and to make renewed efforts to address outstanding issues, including on Jammu and Kashmir. He underlines the need for patience, perseverance and compromise on all sides.”

A week later Nesirky played down that email.  ”The Spokesperson’s Office released to the media guidance which was prepared by the U.N. Secretariat, and that seems to have been taken out of context. This was not a statement of the Secretary-General.”

Nesirky was asked a number of other questions about the “guidance” — was it genuine; what was taken out of context; was it authorized by Ban’s office; what is Ban’s view now; etc. His response was: “I don’t have anything to add.”

The seemingly anodyne statement comes as a separatist strike and security lockdown has dragged on for nearly a month-and-a-half in Muslim-majority Kashmir, a region at the core of a long-running dispute between India and Pakistan. Analysts are worried that if New Delhi fails to check the growing protests, deaths and rights violations Kashmir could slide into a fresh phase of armed uprising that could hurt peace efforts between India and Pakistan.

So where did the U.N. guidance on Kashmir come from? Nesirky won’t say.

Every day, the U.N. press office issues statements on various issues. The headline on one recent press release was “Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s statement on floods in Pakistan.” The actual title of the press release, however, makes clear that it is Ban’s spokesman, not Ban himself, who is speaking: “Statement attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General on the floods in Pakistan.”

Similar to the Kashmir “guidance” the statement on the Pakistan flood is in the third person as the spokesman explains to readers what Ban is doing and how he feels about the flooding: “In response to the tragic flood disaster in Pakistan, the Secretary-General has asked his Special Envoy for Assistance to Pakistan, Jean-Maurice Ripert, to travel to the country as soon as possible.”

One U.N. official said privately that this awkward wording has evolved from the fact that sometimes the secretary-general never sees the statements composed by his army of advisers and issued under his name by his press officers.

But perhaps that wording also offers the U.N. secretariat a way to deny language that backfires, as in the case of the Kashmir “guidance.”

U.N. concerned over Kashmir unrest

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon has expressed concern over the weeks of violent anti-government protests in Kashmir which have killed more than 30 people, dragged in more troops and locked down the disputed Himalayan region.

Policemen stand guard at a barricade set up to stop Kashmiri protesters during a curfew in Srinagar August 2, 2010. REUTERS/Fayaz KabliA separatist strike and security lockdown has dragged on for nearly a month-and-a-half in Muslim-majority Kashmir, a region at the core of a dispute between India and Pakistan.

“In relation to recent developments in Indian-administered Kashmir, the Secretary-General is concerned over the prevailing security situation there over the past month,” Farhan Haq, Ban Ki-Moon’s spokesperson said in a statement.

The Secretary-General has called on all concerned to exercise utmost restraint and address problems peacefully.

But security forces, to quell the daily street protests, have launched a major crackdown across Kashmir and detained at least 1,400 people. The arrests are fuelling more anger.

Most separatist leaders have been arrested or placed under house arrest.

The government has ordered a judicial probe into the deaths of 17 people, mostly protesters, in an attempt to end the crisis amid the biggest demonstrations against Indian rule in two years across the Valley.

But separatists have rejected the magisterial probe and termed it mere eyewash.

The Indian government has blamed separatists and Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Pakistan-based militant group for stoking the latest protests but Kashmiris say the pro-freedom demonstrations are mostly spontaneous.

Most of those killed in the protests are teenagers and many who take part in daily protests are young. Kashmir’s new generation of radicalised separatists may prove a big challenge to New Delhi in future.

Analysts are worried that if New Delhi fails to check the growing protests, deaths and rights violations Kashmir could slide into a fresh phase of armed uprising that could hurt peace efforts between India and Pakistan.

Peace in Kashmir is seen as crucial for improving relations between the two. Both claim the Kashmir region in full but rule it in part.

According to the U.N. statement, Ban Ki-Moon has encouraged both India and Pakistan to rekindle the spirit of the composite dialogue, which was initiated in 2004.

One of the oldest U.N. missions, the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP), still monitors a 1949 ceasefire line dividing Kashmir between India and Pakistan.

The view from Pakistan : India a bigger threat than the Taliban, al Qaeda

A man unloads clay tiles, used for flooring and roofs, from a donkey inside a compound at a makeshift factory in Karachi July 25, 2010.

A man unloads clay tiles, used for flooring and roofs, at a makeshfit factory in Karachi.

India may have  a bigger problem in Pakistan that previously thought. More than half of Pakistanis surveyed in a Pew poll  say India is a bigger threat than al Qaeda or the Taliban. So it’s not just the Pakistani military that believes bigger, richer  India to be the existential threat;  a majority of ordinary people share that perception and that surely ought to worry Indian policy planners looking to find a way around the security establishment and make an opening to the Pakistani people.   Only 23 percent thought the Taliban was the greatest threat to their country, and just 3 percent for al Qaeda, despite the rising tide of militant violence in not just Pakistan’s turbulent northwest region on the Afghan border, but also its cities in the heartland. 

More troubling for India, Pakistanis have mixed views about Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Pakistan based organisation that New Delhi has blamed for a series of attacks in India including the Mumbai assault of 2008.  Just 35% have a negative view of the group, a much lower percentage than for the other extremist organizations tested. One-in-four Pakistanis express a positive assessment, while 40% offer no opinion, Pew reported. For a large number of Indians, memories of the  26/11 attacks in Mumbai are still too fresh, and this will only reinforce  negative perception of the neighbour. Indeed,  India has virtually made all dialogue with Pakistan conditional on the steps in takes to roll up groups like the Lashkar.  The latest poll findings will only strengthen the case of the hawks in New Delhi watchful for any sign of a concession to a country they consider pathologically opposed to India.

One must approach all surveys with caution, especially so in countries such as India and Pakistan with very large population figures .  Pew conducted face-to-face interviews with 2,000 adults in Pakistan between April 13 to 28, 2010. It says the sample was disproportionately urban, and parts of the troubled areas of the northwest and Baluchistan were not covered. For a country with a population of over 170 million, drawing hard conclusions based on a sample size that small  must come with a mandatory health warning. 

Still, there were some positive take-aways.  Despite the deep-seated tensions between these two countries, most Pakistanis want better relations with India. Roughly seven-in-ten (72%) say it is important for relations with India to improve and about three-quarters support increased trade with India and further talks between the two rivals.  But India wouldn’t talk unless Pakistan acts against the groups and their patrons  that it considers waging an asymmetric war against it. And Pakistan won’t act because it doesn’t consider them to be a threat in the way India does.  How do you square such a circle ?

The Indians can take some comfort from the equally poor approval ratings for the United States.    Roughly six in10 (59 percent) Pakistanis describe the U.S. as an enemy.And President Barack Obama is unpopular — only 8% of Pakistanis express confidence that he will do the right thing in world affairs, his lowest ratingamong the 22 nations. So for all the money that has been lavished on Pakistan, the United States seems to be getting nowhere in winning public support. Indeed,  support for the U.S. involvement in the fight against extremists fell over the last year. “The lesson unlearned in fifty years is that feeding Pakistan cash will not alter a national psychosis of war and hatred for the U.S,” as Dr. Aseem Shukla wrote in the Washington Post.

By contrast, the United States enjoys one of the strongest approvals anywhere in the world in India where it provides almost no humanitarian assistance.  A Pew survey last month found India among the top six countries with favourable ratings for America. 

Pakistani expert Imtiaz Gul says the  more Pakistan becomes the subject of international criticism, the more alienated Pakistanis grow. This week, Pakistan is back in the international  glare following the release of classified military documents reinforcing allegations that it was actively collaborating with the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan while accepting massive U.S. aid to fight the militants.  First British Prime Minister David Cameron kicked off a diplomatic offensive against Pakistan,  saying that it cannot be “allowed to look both ways and is able  promote the export of terror, whether to India or whether to Afghanistan, or anywhere else in the world.”    It was the bluntest warning yet from a British leader, delivered during a visit to India  which must rankle further.

And then Afghan President Hamid Karzai  demanded NATO action against militant havens in Pakistan,  raising questions about whether a new-found partnership with Pakistan to find a negotiated settlement would withstand  the impact of the disclosures.   

Is it any wonder then that Pakistanis feel encircled – a rising economic power, India to its east which also threatens its western flank by expanding influence in Afghanistan like a dagger pointed at its heart ?  And then America breathing hard down its neck with its do-more mantra  that has taken a heavy toll of Pakistan blood and treasure.

Overall Pakistanis themselves  remain in a grim mood about the state of their country. Overwhelming majorities are dissatisfied with national conditions, unhappy with the nation’s economy, and concerned about political corruption and crime. Only one-in-five express a positive view of President Asif Ali Zardari, down from 64% just two years ago, Pew said.